Current:Home > StocksThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -AssetFocus
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Chainkeen View
Date:2025-04-09 00:21:44
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (321)
Related
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- What we know about CosMc's, McDonald's nostalgic spin-off coming to some cities in 2024
- Vanessa Hudgens' Beach Day Is the Start of Something New With Husband Cole Tucker
- ‘That's authoritarianism’: Florida argues school libraries are for government messaging
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Search for missing hiker ends after Michigan nurse found dead near Calaveras County trail
- Oil firms are out in force at the climate talks. Here's how to decode their language
- Stock market today: Asian shares slip ahead of key US economic reports
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Older Voters Are Second Only to Young People in Share of ’Climate Voters,’ New Study Shows
Ranking
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- A deer broke into a New Jersey elementary school. Its escape was caught on police bodycams
- Argentina’s outgoing government rejects EU-Mercosur trade deal, but incoming administration backs it
- Prosecutor to drop charges against 17 Austin police officers for force used in 2020 protests
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Top players in the college football transfer portal? We’re tracking them all day long
- Prosecutor to drop charges against 17 Austin police officers for force used in 2020 protests
- 2023 NFL MVP odds: Brock Purdy moves into three-way tie for lead after Week 13
Recommendation
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Supreme Court to hear major case that could upend tax code and doom wealth tax proposals
Regulators begin hearings on how much customers should pay for Georgia nuclear reactors
Mackenzie Phillips' sister Chynna says she's 'proud' of her for revealing father John's incest
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Elon Musk's X platform fueled far-right riots in Ireland, experts say
Law enforcement identify man killed in landslide at Minnesota state park
In GOP’s proposed Georgia congressional map, a key question is which voters are legally protected